<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Derivatives on Thetabruv</title><link>https://thetabruv.com/en/docs/derivati/</link><description>Recent content in Derivatives on Thetabruv</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><atom:link href="https://thetabruv.com/en/docs/derivati/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Futures</title><link>https://thetabruv.com/en/docs/derivati/futures/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thetabruv.com/en/docs/derivati/futures/</guid><description>&lt;h1 id="futures"&gt;Futures&lt;a class="anchor" href="#futures"&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The future is the simplest derivative there is: a mutual commitment to exchange the underlying (or its cash value) at a future date, at a price fixed today. No premium to pay, no choice to exercise: just a symmetric obligation. Whoever is long gains if the price rises and loses if it falls; whoever is short, the exact opposite, dollar for dollar. It is the linear instrument of this site&amp;rsquo;s strategies, and it plays two roles: in the DHCS strategy (&lt;a href="https://thetabruv.com/en/docs/strategie/dhcs/"&gt;DHCS&lt;/a&gt; page) it is the delta-hedging instrument; in the TRPS (&lt;a href="https://thetabruv.com/en/docs/strategie/trps/"&gt;TRPS&lt;/a&gt; page) it is the night sentinel — the hook on which the bot&amp;rsquo;s overnight watch is armed and, in the last resort, plan B for emergencies — being the only index derivative that trades almost 24 hours a day.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Options</title><link>https://thetabruv.com/en/docs/derivati/opzioni/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thetabruv.com/en/docs/derivati/opzioni/</guid><description>&lt;h1 id="options"&gt;Options&lt;a class="anchor" href="#options"&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the future is an obligation, the option is a right. Whoever buys a &lt;strong&gt;call&lt;/strong&gt; acquires the right, not the obligation, to buy the underlying at a predetermined price (the &lt;strong&gt;strike&lt;/strong&gt;) by or on a certain date (the &lt;strong&gt;expiry&lt;/strong&gt;). Whoever buys a &lt;strong&gt;put&lt;/strong&gt; acquires the right to sell on the same terms. Whoever sells the option (the writer) collects a &lt;strong&gt;premium&lt;/strong&gt; upfront and takes on the mirror-image obligation: to suffer exercise whenever it suits the buyer. The asymmetry is all here: the buyer can lose at most the premium, the seller can lose far more. This page builds the minimum vocabulary needed to handle that asymmetry; the next one (&lt;a href="https://thetabruv.com/en/docs/derivati/volatility-risk-premium/"&gt;Volatility risk premium&lt;/a&gt;) will explain why, on average, it is paid more than it should be.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Volatility risk premium</title><link>https://thetabruv.com/en/docs/derivati/volatility-risk-premium/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thetabruv.com/en/docs/derivati/volatility-risk-premium/</guid><description>&lt;h1 id="volatility-risk-premium"&gt;Volatility risk premium&lt;a class="anchor" href="#volatility-risk-premium"&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here we are at the protagonist. The &lt;strong&gt;volatility risk premium&lt;/strong&gt; (VRP) is the systematic gap between the volatility implied in option prices and the volatility the underlying then actually realizes. In the language of the &lt;a href="https://thetabruv.com/en/docs/derivati/"&gt;Derivatives&lt;/a&gt; page: it is the distance between the Q world and the P world, measured on variance. In the insurer&amp;rsquo;s language: it is the difference between the premium collected and the average claim paid out. If it is positive and persistent, selling options is a trade with positive expectancy. This page gathers the evidence, explains the causes and — above all — makes clear exactly what the premium is the price of.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Capital efficiency</title><link>https://thetabruv.com/en/docs/derivati/capital-efficiency/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thetabruv.com/en/docs/derivati/capital-efficiency/</guid><description>&lt;h1 id="capital-efficiency"&gt;Capital efficiency&lt;a class="anchor" href="#capital-efficiency"&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have established that the VRP exists (&lt;a href="https://thetabruv.com/en/docs/derivati/volatility-risk-premium/"&gt;Volatility risk premium&lt;/a&gt; page). The next question is how much it pays, and here comes the first cold shower: in absolute terms, little. A deep OTM 1DTE put sells for about 15 cents, that is, $15 per contract. Repeated 252 times a year on a notional of roughly $730,000 (one SPX contract with the index at 7,300), that makes 15 × 252 / 730,000 ≈ &lt;strong&gt;0.5% per year on notional&lt;/strong&gt;. Half a percentage point. If collecting it required parking the entire notional in cash, the game would not be worth the candle: a T-bill pays more with no tail risk. The entire viability of volatility selling therefore hinges on a seemingly bookkeeping question: &lt;strong&gt;how much capital is actually needed to support the position&lt;/strong&gt;. This is the subject of capital efficiency, and it is the point where many forum discussions go off the rails.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>